-
Blog Search
Latest Articles- Forum Topics
- The Dobharchu
- Obscura Day In Maine: Celebrate 50 Years In Cryptozoology
- The Cryptid Factor: Update
- Voting EXTENDED For Cryptozoology Museum / Phoenix
- Sierra Sasquatch: Habituation Dissected
- Happy St. Patrick’s Day ~ DT vs MQ
- Sierra Sasquatch: The Last Call Blast For MQ?
- Bigfoot or Boot Prints?
- Mysterious Monsters’ Peter Graves Dies
- Maine OOP Gaboon Viper
- Fan Mail
- Maine OOP Gaboon Viper
- Atlas Obscura Day: March 20th
- Mystery Statue: Agogwe or Orang Pendek?
- Mystery Statue: Agogwe or Orang Pendek?
- What Is This Mystery Fish? ~ Again ~
- Voting EXTENDED To The 18th For Cryptozoology Museum / Phoenix
- So What Did You Think Of MQ’s Flatwoods Monster?
- Things Continue Crypto-Weird
- Horned Woman
Google Search
Podcast
Social Nets
Click to subscribeRecommended Podcasts
Member of:
This footage was uploaded just after Spring Festival (hence the fireworks which are heard in the video). It apparently shows a diamond-shaped UFO with a smaller craft nearby.
My personal feeling is that this is nothing more than a large kite, but I put it up here for you to decide.
Recommended Books:
Related Posts
A “Veterinary Assistant” featured in the whole Metepec Creature brouhaha, “Ángel Palacios Núñez”, is, according to Alejandro Franz, in fact Urso Moreno Ruíz, nephew of Mario Moreno, and a taxidermist.
More importantly, Urso Ruíz apparently confessed in an Internet forum he indeed hoaxed the creature, which is indeed just a squirrel-monkey:
“It’s just the corpse of a skinned squirrel-monkey. I took its ears out and involved it with all the hair and fluids of all animals I could find, then I dried it. All samples they take of it will come out as being of different animals.”
Read more:
Forgetamori: The Metepec Creature: author confess hoax
Recommended Books:
Related Posts
The skulls of a mother-and-daughter pair of female Swedish saints, treasured as holy relics for centuries at the abbey of their order, have been exposed as fakes by genetics boffins.
The two skulls were supposed to be those of Saint Bridget (Birgitta) of Sweden and her daughter Saint Catherine (Katarina), noted heavyweight holy ladies of the 14th century.
Saint Bridget was, according to the Catholic Encyclopaedia, “the most celebrated saint of the Northern kingdoms”, famous for having visions of Jesus and writing down stuff he had told her. Born in 1303, she moved to Rome in 1349 and stayed there (barring pilgrimages to the Holy Land and so on) until her death in 1373. She got the thumbs-up for saint status from Pope Boniface IX just 18 years later, an impressive performance – especially when one considers that the intervening period had seen a massive row as to just who was the real Pope.
Bridget’s daughter Catherine, meanwhile, married a German nobleman but managed to persuade him to join her in a vow of mutual chastity and the pair lived as virgins until she joined her mother on the journey to Rome. Her husband, left behind in Sweden, died soon after they got there, and she refused to marry again despite having apparently received many offers. Catholic tradition holds that a magic holy deer of god would turn up and protect her when “unchaste youths sought to ensnare her”. Less hotly fancied in the sainthood stakes than her mother, it took Catherine over a century after her death in 1381 to get canonised.
Read more:
The Register: Swedish mother-daughter saint skulls are ringers, say boffins
Recommended Books:
Related Posts
This report was heard today on Coast to Coast AM.
“The 370 children at Southway Junior School, in Burgess Hill, west Sussex, saw a ’spaceship’ crash near their school and then aliens grabbed a member of staff as part of the performance.The ‘alien invasion’ show, which was supported by Sussex Police, took place without parents being informed, leaving some furious that they had to comfort their terrified children.”
Did this exercise benefit the kids in any way? It is strange that similar kinds of ‘exercises’ are also held across the pond in the US. Every so often we hear of police staging ‘terror attacks’ on school kids without the prior knowledge of the parents. This incident is no different.
Why do these ‘authorities’ feel that these are necessary?
Read the whole report on The Telegraph
Recommended Books:
